Rechte obere Ecke mit Objektivkorrekturen in Lightroom, 200%, f/11. Insgesamt ist bei der kürzesten Brennweite von 24mm mein adaptiertes EF 24-70 f/2.8L II aber doch in allen Bereichen und bei allen Blendenöffnungen schärfer und kontrastreicher, als mein RF 24-105 f/4L IS.
L’autofocus. Le système AF du 24-105 s’en sort très bien, mais il a toujours un peu de pompage alors que le 24-70 n’hésite jamais. Si vous voulez un objectif plus haut de gamme, vous allez trouver votre compte avec le 24-70mm f2.8 : meilleur piqué, plus de contraste et moins de défauts optiques. En revanche, le RF 24-105 mm f4 est
I have the EF 17-40 (pretty decent, may even wanna just pick up a 16-35mm used at some point to get better sharpness) and 24-105 (not my favorite, and the lens creeps down when carrying). I may just give all these a try on the R5 for a few months and either bite the bullet on 24-70 or settle for the RF 24-105. 1.
The Comparison: Canon vs Tamron. Canon’s EF 24-70 f/2.8L II USM has been hailed as the sharpest lens of its type, but it has no image-stabilization, and it carries a hefty price tag at $2049. On the other hand, Tamron’s new 24-70 f/2.8 VC USD does have image stabilization, but the company’s optics only occasionally match the standards
RF 24-70 f2.8 compared to RF 24-105 f4. Jan 28, 2020. Hi All, Going on a year of ownership with my EOS R and it's hands down the most satisfied I've been since getting into this hobby. I've been very happy with the RF 24-105 I purchased in the kit, and have since added the RF 50mm 1.2 which has pretty much lived on the camera the past 4 months.
. 8 326 100 21 5 486 42 310
canon rf 24 105 f4 vs ef 24 70 f2 8
